Posts Tagged: google


26
Feb 07

Google Reader, Pageviews And Feedvertising

There are 3 Google services I use every day, all day. They are Google Search, Google Mail and Google Reader. Google Reader delivers the content from my favorite sites directly to me, all in one place. I don’t have to worry about remembering to visit every site I would like to visit every day. This saves me time and energy, but the thing it saves me the most is bandwidth. Saving bandwidth in this country is important because it costs so damn much.

Google Reader is web based feed reader. [what is a feed?]

So how does Google Reader effect pageviews?
It isn’t just Google Reader, it’s any feed aggregator that affects pageviews. I am disregarding AJAX and other technologies that make it harder to track pageviews, I am focusing on Google Reader and other feed aggregators.

If you think about it logically the more users that read the content from your site via Google Reader the less pageviews you will receive. So we end up with a dilemma, we want users to view content via feeds (otherwise we wouldn’t offer feeds) yet we still want them to browse around our site, read related articles and maybe even click on our cleverly placed ads. I have a few suggested solutions for this problem.

Increase click though rate from feeds.
I can think of 3 ways to increase click through rates from articles read via feeds.

  1. Showing only article summary.
    Instead of the user being able to read the whole article they will only be able to read a short summary of it and if they are interested in reading the rest of the article they will have to click on a link which will bring them right to your site. However you do get those lazy users who don’t bother clicking through.
  2. Linking to previous articles.
    You should do this any way. Linking to previous related articles in your current article is beneficial because it encourages users to read previous articles and even search engines follow the links and crawl the pages more frequently allowing them to be indexed higher in search rankings.
  3. Related articles in feed.
    I have seen a lot of sites that display related articles at the end of an article or on the side menu. This is just as beneficial as the point above. What would be even better is if this was applied to feeds. At the end of each article a few related articles should be listed.

Generating income from your feeds.
There are so many sites out there that have some form of advertising on them. These however all rely on pageviews because it is common sense, the more pageviews the more chance of you receiving and income from advertising. Now that pageviews are decreasing due to feeds, how do we solve this?

  1. Feedvertising.
    No, it’s not bad spelling. There is an actual term for advertising in your feeds. There are a few places that offer services that allow bloggers, webmasters and site owners to place adverts in their feeds and earn from them. I have seen a lot from Text Link Ads and I know Feedburner has some sort of feedvertising offering. Google Adsense are currently beta testing a feedvertising solution.

Here are some screen shots from Google Reader.
Google Reader - Home Google Reader - Techcrunch Feed Google Reader - Subscriptions


22
Feb 07

24.com Lightning Fast Index

I was a little bored earlier today so I went to a few search engines and typed in “tyler reed” and clicked search. I didn’t bother with Google because I know they take a while to index sites and display it in search results. (I mean the site was just launched yesterday). Any way the site that surprised me the most was 24.com. In just over 24 hours I am indexed and the first result. This is really something quite special. It raises two questions for me though.

  1. Why was I indexed so fast?
    Google, Yahoo and Live are all aware of this site but due to the fact that the site is only just over 24 hours old they would never display my site in the search results until the site gained some age and maybe even a little link popularity. I’m guessing maybe after a week or two I will be indexed deep somewhere in their search results. 24.com on the other hand has thrown me in the number 1 position for the keyword “tyler reed“. How are they able to validate that this sites content is valid and not just spam? This leads me to my second question.
  2. How accurate are results from 24.com?
    A simple search for Mike Stopforth reveals that they are not very accurate at all. But wait, let us think again, carefully. Mike Stopforth‘s domain ends with .com and we’re searching sites in South Africa only. Now this is something that really gets to me, local search engines can’t distinguish between local content and content from the rest of the world. Even Google’s search from pages in South Africa suffers from this. Mike’s website is clearly full of local content. So it’s clear .co.za domains get preference over any other domain and perhaps others are even ignored, which makes sense, how ever it affects the accuracy of search results. It also affects your online branding. Sure most people in South Africa use Google for searching, but people use 24.com and MWeb search as well.

I also searched for “tyler reed” on Grabble. It returned nothing relevant so perhaps Justin Hartman the creator of Grabble can shed some light on how Grabble crawls and indexes sites.

Something else I would like to mention is that MWeb’s search is really starting to come up. They have had a make over and are returning some really accurate results. kiefpiet another blog I run has started receiving a lot of traffic from MWeb’s search.

Update: It seems Google is also pretty quick, less than 48 hours and I come in 5th, “tyler reed“. Yahoo and Live still don’t seem to have me indexed. On the local side, Grabble and Aardvark rank me in at No. 1, Jonga and Ananzi are still fast asleep.

Another Update: Yahoo now indexes me at No. 4. Google now hits me up to position No. 2.

Here are some screen shots of the search results.
24.com - Tyler Reed 24.com - Mike Stopforth Grabble - Tyler Reed